The Bath Shakespeare Society

Click on image for Menu                                                                                                                          Click on image for Menu

menu menu

Summer Newsletter 2015

The Birthday Celebration

My favourite Shakespeare play

In Memoriam

SUMMER EVENTS

2016

The Birthday Celebration

This year our chairman, Peter Davies welcomed a Mayor with a difference. Cherry Beath had not only acted in Shakespeare at school (she toured in Germany as Perdita in The Winter's Tale ) but was distantly related to Laurence Olivier. With this background it was no surprise that she had studied Dick Tahta's History of the Society before coming to our party and promised her support for our centenary project of the restoration of the 1864 Shakespeare Monument in the Dell in Victoria Park. She described herself as Bath's Champion for Culture and should be a helpful long-term contact for the Society.

Our lecturer this year was our own Tony Ryan and his subject "Henry VII: the play Shakespeare dared not write. He has kindly provided the following summary of his talk.

"Using coats of arms to designate historical figures and significant locations, Tony Ryan’s talk, Henry VII, The Play Shakespeare Dared Not Write, illustrated the passive roles the two shady figures Lambert Simnel and Perkin Warbeck, played as false Plantagenet heirs in Yorkist conspiracies to dethrone the victor of the Battle of Bosworth.

Few realise that Lambert Simnel was crowned in Dublin as ‘King Edward VI’ or that, in his name, an international force landed in the north of England to be defeated at the Battle of Eaststoke. Some years later, the Flemish born Perkin Warbeck found himself in Cork, where he was persuaded by Yorkist sympathisers that he was the Earl of Warwick, the only son of the Duke of Clarence, at the time a prisoner in the Tower of London since the age of 10.

Margaret Plantagenet, Dowager Duchess of Burgundy duped by Warbeck’s supporters, funded a second international army of invasion. It landed at Deal and was soon exterminated.

Following a futile invasion from Scotland, where he married a near relation of King James IV, Warbeck was persuaded to join a rebellion of Cornishmen. It failed; Warbeck was taken to London, tried and executed for high treason.

A stain on the reign of Henry VII, with lasting consequences for the Tudor dynasty, was caused when the King, for reasons of policy, had the young, simple-minded Earl of Warwick executed for high treason. A crime of which he was not only innocent but incapable of perpetrating."

After the applause for Tony's lecture had subsided, we assembled at the back of the lecture room, charged our glasses for the toast "To  the memory of  William Shakespeare" proposed by the Mayor and then moved on to lunch which was followed by the ceremonial cutting by the Mayor of an Agincourt Cake (1415) with a well-known portrait of Henry V sculptured in icing.

It was a great pleasure to see at the Birthday Celebration John Bulman and Susan Fraser, two of our former Chairmen who are rarely able to attend meetings these days.

 Our thanks go to our Chairman Peter Davies, Secretary Tony Ryan, Treasurer Diana Pidgeon for organising this always enjoyable event and to Evelyn Bates and her team of helpers for providing our magnificent lunch. We are also grateful to BRSLI for allowing us to use their prestigious premises once again.

                                                               Back to top

My favourite Shakespeare play

Susan Fraser contributes the first of what I hope will be a regular series of articles for our  newsletter.

"Having begun my introduction to our recent reading of Antony & Cleopatra by saying that it was my favourite play, I felt in honour bound to accept our editor's invitation to start this new series.

In some ways, it is easier to say what Antony & Cleopatra is not. It is not for example one of the “great” plays, nor is it among the most profound, being neither a Hamlet nor a Lear. Given that it is a history play (of a kind), it also lacks the scope both in character and incident of a Henry IV part one and in comparison to the other Roman plays, has not the same breadth of politico-social content, in that the mob, although present to the minds of the chief characters, makes no  actual appearance. Nor are there any really malign characters – not an Edmund or an Iago. It is true that Menas, the pirate, has dastardly intentions, but he is not permitted to carry them out. And further, the play’s construction is so loose, so many minor characters in so many short scrappy scenes, three battles with no actual combat, seven deaths, the five on stage all suicides, that I cannot help wondering what Shakespeare’s fellow actors can have made of it on first sight, especially in view of the fact that his actors will only have had their own lines, plus a cue, and not the complete text as would be the case today. Then while there are only four leading roles, there are a further thirty named smaller roles as well as the usual assortment of messengers, soldiers and watchmen. I am tempted to set a question paper: members of the Society are to distinguish between Varrius, Scarus and Gallus, Menecrates and Maecenas, Dolabella, Diomedes and Dercetus, and, furthermore, to name the odd one out*.

 So what makes it so attractive to me?  My first response is to say, in spite of all that I have said about its construction, that  it does work on stage; there is dramatic content, contrast in mood and setting, plenty of action, the scraps of scenes flowing together to give a vivid impression of swiftly changing events. Above all, the four main characters, Octavius, Enobarbus, Antony and Cleopatra are each so strongly contrasted in personality that dramatic tension is always present whichever of them is absent. Unusually in Shakespeare there is no sub-plot and the lesser characters are not allowed to obscure the main action.  Most of the scenes are short and so too are the speeches, adding to the dramatic flow.

Mention of the speeches brings me to the play’s crowning glory – its language. As Valerie Crofts pointed out during our discussion of the play, Antony & Cleopatra has some of Shakespeare’s finest verse and in this respect the play bears comparison with his very best. The language here is often compressed as in “Our Italy shines o’er with civil swords” and there are some nonce words like “discandy” which occur nowhere else. Yet as always with Shakespeare, it’s the monosyllabic lines which are the most memorable - “ Finish good lady. The bright day is done And we are for the dark”- did he ever write anything better than that? Imagery throughout the play has to do with the element of  water which notoriously does not hold firm –“ The rack dislimns and makes it indistinct As water is in water”  or Antony again on Octavia - “The swan’s down feather That stands upon the swell at full of tide And neither way inclines” Each of the principals has his own way of speaking, Octavius, the smooth politician, Enobarbus, the bluff soldier, Antony, the high-born Roman gone native (Greek) and Cleopatra, the scheming femme fatale with a gift for the magniloquent.

 What in the end does Shakespeare want us to think? Is this middle aged romance, Romeo and Juliet with wrinkles? Or is it, as Plutarch thought, grim tragedy, the portrait of a fine man who ruined by his obsession with a siren who is as false as she is beautiful?  Or is it a picture of the world well lost, political power abandoned for love everlasting? I think it has some of all these ideas in it but the lasting impression it makes on me is that of an elegy for a warmer, nobler world passing away with the arrival of the hard-faced men with tablets or whatever the Roman equivalent was of the clipboard. Antony is from the beginning a loser – slowly he comes to realise that  the world he has known is slipping from him. He even bungles his own suicide. Yet even  Caesar mourns the death of so generous a man; is there any character in all Shakespeare more giving and forgiving than Antony?  He dies, seeking Cleopatra’s pardon in his turn. She, by contrast, would choose to live on without him, if she could avoid the horrors of Caesar’s triumph. Faced with the inexorable will of Caesar, she chooses rather to die like a queen, (provided always that this can be painlessly achieved).  She remains Cleopatra to the last, queen and serpent combined, transformed into the warm elements of air and fire. Rome is left the winner – down to earth, practical, efficient,  power- hungry and essentially cold.  Shakespeare seems to accept that Octavius Caesar has to be the victor but perhaps we can still regret the passing of a warmer happier age.

Gallus, who doesn’t say anything at all, which is why you can’t remember him; one of Shakespeare’s ghost characters                                                   Back to top

In Memoriam

During the past year two much-loved former members have died, Iris Hopton and Janet Ronchetti. After joining in 1970, Iris was an active member of the Society for more than 35 years. She was twice a member of the Committee for periods of 3-4 years and actively involved in casting and convening (she chose the notorious hot potato Titus Andronicus in 1985). In 1986 she directed and introduced a scene from Hamlet as part of the Birthday Celebration. She is remembered as a first-rate reader and a great Shakespeare enthusiast. A domestic accident left her with severe burns on her legs, which confined her to a nursing home for the rest of her life, but she remained amazingly cheerful and continued to follow the activities of the Society. A group of members visited her in the nursing home to celebrate her 90th birthday and share some readings. Her funeral was private, but Mary Barry organised a Memorial Service for her at St. Mary's Bathwick which was attended by 6 members.

Janet Ronchetti joined the Society in 2000 and was a committee member from 2005 until 2010 when she had to leave the Society. She is remembered for her warm and friendly personality and also for her great energy. After marrying into a farming family and raising six children, she trained as a nurse. Apart from the Society, in which she was a great help with the Birthday catering, her hobby was making stained glass which she did with such success that her stall at the Bath Christmas market sold out. She died in August 2014 at the age of 75 and Susan and Tony attended her Requiem at the packed St. Mary's, Julian Road.. Her eldest son John quoted her motto as being "enjoy life before it's too late". Advice for us all.                                                                         Back to top


SUMMER EVENTS

2nd and 9th June - The White Devil - John Webster

This is our Summer Reading at the usual time and place. This year we revert to a play by a contemporary of Shakespeare. Alison Smerdon will guide us through this action-packed and bloodthirsty drama. Do come and support us if you can, but bring your own copy of the play. Webster is one of the few Elizabethan playwrights who can (on a good day) match Shakespeare for poetry.

24th- 27th June - Hamlet at the Tithe Barn, Bradford on Avon

Don't miss this production by the Bradfordians, starring our own Graham Billing as Polonius. Details are available at www.thebradfordians.com. Booking is from the Wiltshire Music Centre 01225 860100 or www.wiltshiremusic.org.uk.

 6th-11th July - Taming of the Shrew at Lackham House, Lacock

Shakespeare Live are again playing at Lackham House. Book by phone to their Box Office on 07780 938107 or online at www.shakespearelive.com.

May-October 2015 at the RSC Stratford-upon-Avon

This summer's plays are The Merchant of Venice, Othello and Henry V. On the 20th June a small group of members is going to The Merchant on a visit organised by our Chairman. Otherwise, book by phone on 0844 8001110 or on line at www.rsc.org.uk.

1st - 18th July - She Stoops to Conquer at Theatre Royal Bath

No Shakespeare this summer, but you might like to try Goldsmith's play. Call 01225 448844 or book online at www.theatreroyal.org.uk.                                            Back to top

2016

With the Society's Centenary and the 400th anniversary of Shakespeare's death to commemorate, this will be a very special year in our history. Look forward to a year of publicity, parties and possibly even performance.

There will be much to write about, so this seems a golden opportunity to hand on the editorship of the Newsletter. I have enjoyed writing it for the past eight years and my grateful thanks go to anyone who survived the ordeal of reading them. Ave atque vale.

R.M.Johnson          

 Back to top

Free Web Hosting